@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):
That is no problem, you adjust the base URL with the environment variables. According to Gemini their APIs are designed to be interopable
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
the linter is not 100% accurate
it is not a linter. When you save your config Frigate will create an entirely new FrigateApp object, meaning it is…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):
Explanation of Parameters: base_url: This is the most critical parameter. It tells the openai client where to send the API requests. If you're using…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
right, but in that case you would likely just want to use the UI. Create sets of camera groups and show each group. The UI is designed to show things…
@PersephoneKarnstein commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):
Ooh ok thank you
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025):
To be honest I don't think this really works as well as being suggested. The problem is if birdseye works dynamically, then you have no idea why a…
@extremeshok commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
Guard / Gate House, were there are multiple 65" screens , its more preferable to have the screen showing something, than nothing. The object…
@extremeshok commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
fyi, save+restart will save an invalid code in the current version. the linter is not 100% accurate
@PersephoneKarnstein commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):
it doesn't, actually. They're similar, but different. Usually the difference is that Open WebUI endpoints start with /api/ and OpenAI…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
Where are you using this stream? This seems like a case where the webui should be preferable?
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
The built in editor does not allow you to have an invalid config.
We've also implemented a recovery state config UI so you can still access the…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):
This is already supported as Open WebUI uses the OpenAI API format
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
but without proper RBAC and user training, one can not allow interactivity.
Right, so the development effort should just be spent on that
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2025):
The UI is meant to be interacted with, I don't see why the scenario you suggest wouldn't have a mouse or some means to interact with the system.
In…