@hawkeye217 commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
Thanks for your feature request. A few things come to mind:
- The default behavior when clicking "Mark these items as reviewed" in the Review…
@nagisa commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
(EDIT: thanks for sharing the different perspective, I can see how my proposal could break other use-cases, yeah)
The default behavior when clicking…
@hawkeye217 commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
Hm, I do have the "show reviewed" switch turned off most of the time. The items however do not disappear immediately once I press the "mark"…
@nagisa commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
That could be a bug indeed! Here's a video I made of this (the videos themselves are blurred out with some slight modifications to css via inspector…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
This bug will be fixed in the next 0.17 build
@nagisa commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
In that case I don't think this FR serves any further purpose. Thank you for engaging with me on this one!
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2026):
If you dynamically added and removed cameras while scrubbing it would be way more difficult to use as the cameras would be switching positions…
@sudheerlucky commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026):
also it better to have wait call system to use train button to avoid multiple training at same time
kind of wail till training to complate…
@NickM-27 commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2026):
Thanks for the feature request, however we're not able to support ultralytics models at this time, see https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/pull…