@Bluscream commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2018):
Implemented with 7eac968a613d8f0bae4df483edf2eb1435c6f82d
@Bluscream commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2018):
Yes.
@Chazotu commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2018):
does this spam the not implemented message ?
@Bluscream commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2018):
Yeah sadly it cant just drop a packer because then the server would miss the packet with that number
@Chazotu commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2018):
Is there or will there be a build server for the extensions in the future?
@exp111 commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2018):
Integrated in 659c34c97f8a04aaf36183d4bd507aa3cd3c369e. Needs a way to check server type though
@exp111 commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2018):
As I don‘t have a server I can‘t make one. Don‘t know if some public build services can build qt stuff. I have a linux partition so I can try…
@exp111 commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2018):
Does it get sent? I thought the patch would not send it if you have canceled enabled.
Edit: I think the hook just sets the data to "_hook_canceled".…
@exp111 commented on GitHub (May 26, 2018):
Mhhh weird… Does it work like that? (Shouldn‘t but I remember that feature working) Else try the ts3lib.getCurrentServerConnectionHandler()…
